Even a broken clock is right twice a day

Author
Roberto Plaja

ETFs will underperform actively managed funds at some point; just stay the course and don’t ditch them

ETFs will underperform actively managed funds at some point; just stay the course and don’t ditch them

ETFs will underperform actively managed funds at some point; just stay the course and don’t ditch them

You heard it here first: active funds will outperform passive funds, sometime, somewhere, in some market, over the next few months, or years. At which point, however briefly, we shall be inundated with I-told-you-so’s from all quarters – the truly most talented investors as well as the obviously most clueless salespersons and, of course, the press. And if you are not careful you will to be dragged into the fray and begin concocting all sorts of clever justifications to pay those 1.0%-1.5% TERs (which conservatively are more like 1.5%-3.0% when you include trading costs; see this paper) forever thereafter.

You shouldn’t.

I’m aware that hardly a day goes by without a mention of the boom in exchange traded funds and how most active managers struggle to keep up with their performance. While the “news” is old, the growth of passive investing has been truly phenomenal, despite increasing preoccupations with respect to potential liquidity or systemic problems, uncertainties on the use of leverage (well-founded), concerns on securities lending programs (less well founded) and other sundry stories. There is also a lot of confusion on what exactly ETFs are today and how they should be used: witness the proliferation of active investment strategies (re-branded smart beta) masquerading as passive approaches by wrapping themselves in an ETF. Finally, one of the main sponsors and drivers of these investment vehicles, Jack Bogle of Vanguard, has now gone as far as accusing ETFs of fostering the very thing they were designed to avoid: active trading (see this FT article).

My contrarian mind smells a rat when I think about all this. Nurtured by the maxim that nothing ever moves only on a straight line – not even the most profitable investments – this rat is less a catastrophic foreboding and more an inspired cautionary hint. As the title of this post implies, even the worst ideas sometimes have a chance to shine.

Extreme popularity of a good idea brings complacency and unreasonable expectations which, when mixed with normal everyday randomness, often lead to disastrous long-term investment decisions. ETFs will not always win, every month, every quarter, every year; but on average they will deliver the market return you seek. Alternatively, at some point active managers will beat their benchmarks for some time, but that probably will not signal a true regime change where any additional cost will be covered by the ultimate result.

So, brace yourself and be strong: as for all things in life, when this anomaly will take place tell yourselves “this too shall pass” and stay the course.
You heard it here first: active funds will outperform passive funds, sometime, somewhere, in some market, over the next few months, or years. At which point, however briefly, we shall be inundated with I-told-you-so’s from all quarters – the truly most talented investors as well as the obviously most clueless salespersons and, of course, the press. And if you are not careful you will to be dragged into the fray and begin concocting all sorts of clever justifications to pay those 1.0%-1.5% TERs (which conservatively are more like 1.5%-3.0% when you include trading costs; see this paper) forever thereafter.

You shouldn’t.

I’m aware that hardly a day goes by without a mention of the boom in exchange traded funds and how most active managers struggle to keep up with their performance. While the “news” is old, the growth of passive investing has been truly phenomenal, despite increasing preoccupations with respect to potential liquidity or systemic problems, uncertainties on the use of leverage (well-founded), concerns on securities lending programs (less well founded) and other sundry stories. There is also a lot of confusion on what exactly ETFs are today and how they should be used: witness the proliferation of active investment strategies (re-branded smart beta) masquerading as passive approaches by wrapping themselves in an ETF. Finally, one of the main sponsors and drivers of these investment vehicles, Jack Bogle of Vanguard, has now gone as far as accusing ETFs of fostering the very thing they were designed to avoid: active trading (see this FT article).

My contrarian mind smells a rat when I think about all this. Nurtured by the maxim that nothing ever moves only on a straight line – not even the most profitable investments – this rat is less a catastrophic foreboding and more an inspired cautionary hint. As the title of this post implies, even the worst ideas sometimes have a chance to shine.

Extreme popularity of a good idea brings complacency and unreasonable expectations which, when mixed with normal everyday randomness, often lead to disastrous long-term investment decisions. ETFs will not always win, every month, every quarter, every year; but on average they will deliver the market return you seek. Alternatively, at some point active managers will beat their benchmarks for some time, but that probably will not signal a true regime change where any additional cost will be covered by the ultimate result.

So, brace yourself and be strong: as for all things in life, when this anomaly will take place tell yourselves “this too shall pass” and stay the course.
You heard it here first: active funds will outperform passive funds, sometime, somewhere, in some market, over the next few months, or years. At which point, however briefly, we shall be inundated with I-told-you-so’s from all quarters – the truly most talented investors as well as the obviously most clueless salespersons and, of course, the press. And if you are not careful you will to be dragged into the fray and begin concocting all sorts of clever justifications to pay those 1.0%-1.5% TERs (which conservatively are more like 1.5%-3.0% when you include trading costs; see this paper) forever thereafter.

You shouldn’t.

I’m aware that hardly a day goes by without a mention of the boom in exchange traded funds and how most active managers struggle to keep up with their performance. While the “news” is old, the growth of passive investing has been truly phenomenal, despite increasing preoccupations with respect to potential liquidity or systemic problems, uncertainties on the use of leverage (well-founded), concerns on securities lending programs (less well founded) and other sundry stories. There is also a lot of confusion on what exactly ETFs are today and how they should be used: witness the proliferation of active investment strategies (re-branded smart beta) masquerading as passive approaches by wrapping themselves in an ETF. Finally, one of the main sponsors and drivers of these investment vehicles, Jack Bogle of Vanguard, has now gone as far as accusing ETFs of fostering the very thing they were designed to avoid: active trading (see this FT article).

My contrarian mind smells a rat when I think about all this. Nurtured by the maxim that nothing ever moves only on a straight line – not even the most profitable investments – this rat is less a catastrophic foreboding and more an inspired cautionary hint. As the title of this post implies, even the worst ideas sometimes have a chance to shine.

Extreme popularity of a good idea brings complacency and unreasonable expectations which, when mixed with normal everyday randomness, often lead to disastrous long-term investment decisions. ETFs will not always win, every month, every quarter, every year; but on average they will deliver the market return you seek. Alternatively, at some point active managers will beat their benchmarks for some time, but that probably will not signal a true regime change where any additional cost will be covered by the ultimate result.

So, brace yourself and be strong: as for all things in life, when this anomaly will take place tell yourselves “this too shall pass” and stay the course.
May also be of interest
See all Insights →
May also be of interest
See all Insights →
May also be of interest
See all Insights →
Autorisation
Social Media
Navigation
Documents
Language
Switzerland
© SIMPLEWEALTH AG 2015 — 2022.
MADE WITH ❤️ IN BEAUTIFUL
Investing implies your capital is at risk. The value of your account depends on market movements and you may get back less than you invest.
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance. Unless otherwise specified, all return figures shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not actual customer or model returns. Actual returns will vary greatly and depend on personal and market conditions.
Simplewealth AG is a Swiss-based advisory service, designed to assist clients in achieving discrete financial goals. We are not intended to provide comprehensive tax advice or financial planning with respect to every aspect of a client's financial situation and do not incorporate specific investments that clients hold elsewhere.
Investing in securities involves risks, and there is always the potential of losing money when you invest in securities. Before investing, consider your investment objectives and Simplewealth AG charges and expenses.
Client securities accounts at Interactive Brokers LLC are protected by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC") for a maximum coverage of $500,000 (with a cash sublimit of $250,000) and under Interactive Brokers LLC's excess SIPC policy with certain underwriters at Lloyd's of London 1 for up to an additional $30 million (with a cash sublimit of $900,000) subject to an aggregate limit of $150 million. Futures and options on futures are not covered. As with all securities firms, this coverage provides protection against failure of a broker-dealer, not against loss of market value of securities. For the purpose of determining an Interactive Brokers LLC client account, accounts with like names and titles (e.g. John and Jane Smith and Jane and John Smith) are combined, but accounts with different titles are not (e.g. Individual/John Smith and IRA/John Smith). SIPC is a non-profit, membership corporation funded by broker-dealers that are members of SIPC.
All your investments are insured. Up to USD 500k
2
Investing in securities involves risks, and there is always the potential of losing money when you invest in securities. Before investing, consider your investment objectives and Simplewealth AG charge sand expenses.
How your assets can grow?
1